Tonada
Back to Blog
ResearchJuly 1, 2026

What In-Store Music Actually Costs a Growing Chain

What In-Store Music Actually Costs a Growing Chain

What In-Store Music Actually Costs a Growing Chain

The bill nobody budgets for

You can tell me your cost per square meter, your labor percentage, your average ticket. Ask most operators what they spend on music across their locations, and you get a shrug.

That shrug is expensive. In-store music sits in a blind spot, so it quietly compounds in fees, in legal exposure, and in revenue you never see leave. Here is what it actually costs.

Cost 1: The licensing stack (and the fines that follow)

Most people picture "a music license" as a single line item. In reality, the rights to popular music are split across multiple collecting societies: GEMA in Germany, PRS for Music and PPL in the UK, SACEM in France, SAMI in Sweden, and their equivalents everywhere else. They cover different rights, one society for the songwriters, another for the performers. A business playing normal popular music needs to be licensed with each relevant society, in each country it operates.

The fees scale with the size of the space. In the UK, PRS for Music licences commonly start near £100 a year and PPL adds up to roughly £350 more, with extra zones often charged separately again.

Now multiply by every location, in every country. The fees grow every time you sign a lease and every time you cross a border. It is one of the few costs that scales with your success and gives you nothing extra in return.

The fallback most teams rely on, a personal Spotify account behind the counter, is not a loophole. Consumer accounts prohibit commercial use, and playing them in your stores can lead to fines.

Cost 2: Sounding exactly like the store next door

Licensed background music comes from shared catalogs. That is the model: the same library, sold to many businesses. So the café across the street and your direct competitor down the block can be playing the identical track at the identical moment.

For a brand that obsesses over its logo and packaging, the soundtrack is a strange place to surrender. Sound is one of the stickiest forms of memory there is. Most consumers recall a brand more easily when it has a distinct sound, and a consistent sonic identity meaningfully lifts recall. A rented playlist gives you none of that. You are paying every year to sound like everyone else.

Cost 3: The revenue you never see leave

This one is invisible because it never shows up as a charge. It shows up as sales that did not happen.

Music changes how people behave in a space. The foundational research found that tempo alone can move sales by significant margins, with slower music extending dwell time and lifting gross sales by as much as 38% versus faster music in the same store. Yet most operators test their menus, signage, and checkout flow while the soundtrack stays frozen on a static playlist that has no idea whether it is a dead Tuesday or a Friday rush. That gap is real money, and it never sends an invoice.

The number that should replace all of this

Your current music cost is really three numbers: a licensing bill that grows with every location, a legal risk nobody wants to quantify, and lost revenue you cannot measure. Tonada replaces all three with one.

Every Tonada track is original and generated for your brand, so there are no rights holders. No GEMA, PRS, PPL, SACEM or SAMI, no collection societies in any country, no per-play fees, no consumer-account risk. That is one predictable subscription instead of a stack of invoices that multiplies with every location and every border.

You also stop sounding like everyone else. Your locations get an exclusive, owned catalog, a signature sound as unique as your visual identity.

And the soundtrack finally goes to work. Tonada plugs into your POS, occupancy sensors, weather feed, and event calendar, so the music shifts with what is actually happening. The same connection that pipes audio out pipes insight back in, so you can see how your sound maps to dwell time and basket size.

You are already paying for music. The only question is whether you are paying to sound like everyone else while the bill grows, or paying once for a sound that is yours and earns its keep.

See what your brand could sound like. Get started.


Sources: Milliman (1982) and subsequent consumer-behavior literature on music tempo and retail sales; GEMA background-music tariffs (gema.de) and PRS for Music / PPL PRS tariff guides (2025); sonic-branding recall studies (SoundOut, Audira Insights 2025). Verify current GEMA, PRS and PPL rates for your markets and venue sizes before publishing.

Share:

Turn your data into smart playlists

Discover how Tonada helps brands create data-driven audio experiences across every location.